A higher CUET score requires a stronger aptitude. Enrol in the General Aptitude Test Online Course for just ₹100!




 29-Apr-2025

India’s Extended Continental Shelf Claim

Geography

Why in News? 

India has recently expanded its claim in the Central Arabian Sea, increasing the extent of its extended continental shelf by nearly 10,000 square kilometres. To avoid escalating a long-standing maritime boundary dispute with Pakistan, India has also modified its earlier claim. 

Dispute Over Maritime Boundary 

  • Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): Coastal nations have special rights over marine resources in their EEZ, extending up to 200 nautical miles from their coastline. 
    • This area extends continuously from the landmass to the seabed. 
    • It is considered part of the country's extended continental shelf. 
  • India initially submitted its claim in 2009 to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS), a UN body. 
  • In 2021, Pakistan objected, particularly regarding the disputed Sir Creek region. 
  • In March 2023, the CLCS rejected India's original claim in the Arabian Sea but permitted submission of a modified claim. 

 

Diagrammatic representation of Exclusive Economic Zone  

 About the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) 

  • CLCS headquarters: United Nations Headquarters, New York. 
  • Objective: To assist in implementing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) regarding the extension of a country’s continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles. 
  • Nature of Recommendations: The recommendations issued by CLCS are final and binding on coastal states. 

 

About Sir Creek: 

  • Sir Creek is a 96-km-long disputed tidal estuary. 
  • It extends into the Arabian Sea, serving as a rough divider between the Sindh province of Pakistan and the Kutch region of Gujarat, India. 
  • In 1947, India advocated for the Thalweg Principle (setting the boundary along the navigable channel’s midpoint) to resolve the issue. 
  • Pakistan, however, contended that Sir Creek was non-navigable, disputing settlement under the Thalweg Principle. 

 

Location: Sir Creek